|
© 2010 Mahala Yates Stripling
All Rights Reserved
=========================
This publication has 3 maps, 20 pages of
photographs, and 2 fan-tree genealogies.
IMAGINE A MAN: THE
SURGEON STORYTELLER
A
Literary Biography of Richard Selzer, in two parts.
Part 1: Reinventing his life (1928-1984)
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
Cover Sketch: RS
(1988), presented by his friend Richard B. Sewall
Flyleaf painting
of Second Street door (Armstrong)
Foreword (by
medical humanities illuminati)
Preface
List of
Abbreviations
Chronology of
Events
Introduction
I. A Family
of Weepers (1899-1927)
II. The Young Trojan (1928-36)
III. Doctors’
Row (1937-41)
IV. High
School and War (1941-45)
V. Becoming
a Doctor (1945-52)
VI. Yale—Drafted and Married (1953-55)
VII. Korea:
Despair and Resolution (1955)
VIII. Korea:
Hope and Celebration (1956)
IX.
Returning to Yale—Chief Resident (1957-60)
X. The
Doctor with Two Heads
(1961-67)
XI. Saint, Fellow & Friend—Published (1968-70)
XII.
Surgeons Love Horror, Don't You Know? (1971-74)
XIII. The
Birth of Literature and Medicine (1975)
XIV.
Mortal Lessons: The Doctor as Writer (1976-78)
XV. Artist
in Residence (Bellagio/Yaddo) 1979-84
XVI. The Last
Grand Rounds at Yale (Dec. 15, 1984)
Afterword
Endnotes/Works
Cited
Sketches, Maps,
and Photographs
Acknowledgments
Index
PREFACE
I am really
the simplest of men, an open book myself. When asked recently
about my literary influences, I was quick to kneel at the feet of
Edgar Allan Poe. . . . Even now, some seventy years later, I am
easily bewitched by the great enchanter. Nowadays it just doesn't do
to profess a liking for Poe. He has been dismissed by the
arbiters of taste. But not by me. I loved him then; I
love him still. I don't know how one can write a biography of
someone whose literary taste is so primitive. Harold Bloom
would curl his lip at the news--Richard Selzer
Its typical of Richard Selzer to humbly profess a kind of literary naiveté when his work teems with references to Homer, Shakespeare, and Chekhov. But Anton Chekhov is about as modern as Selzer's taste gets. Although he reads voraciously, including in French, Italian, and Latin, rarely will you find him immersed in anything
au courant.
Perhaps Selzer's humility--be it real or teasing--stems from his
awareness that many writers consider literature a full-time occupation,
without having also pursued an important career as a surgeon. But
Selzer has integrated his two disciplines in imaginative ways, and
today he is often mentioned in the
same breath with his literary ancestors Chekhov, John Keats, and William Carlos Williams.
Selzer's short stories, essays, art critiques,
diaries, letters, and memoirs have appeared in thirteen books from 1974 to the present.
A novel he wrote fifty years ago on his experiences in Korea has been
reclaimed and makes his fourteenth book. Many of these books have been translated into several different languages and
none have ever been out of print due in large part to staunch lay readers and patients. Educators use them in high school English classes and bioethics clubs; undergraduate, graduate, and medical school science and humanities courses; and post-graduate medical training to teach writing skills (theme and style) and bioethical lessons (morality of issues) as well as to provide models for patient care.
And because we are all patients, Selzers growing legacy to us comes through his poetic perception on the human condition, which inspires our doctors in their work. In addition, his writings and mentoring of others helped to establish the interdisciplinary field of literature and medicine. For his contributions, he has been recognized abundantly, having received the National Magazine Award, the Pushcart Prize, a Guggenheim and a National Endowment for the Arts Fellowship, and the American Medical Writer's Association Book Award. He was a PEN/Faulkner Award semifinalist and has received over a dozen honorary degrees. He has been a resident scholar at both Yaddo in Saratoga Springs, New York, and at the Bellagio Study Center on Lake Como, Italy.
Selzer's
literary biography,
begun fifteen years ago, is his first full biographical treatment.
Volume I is a straightforward narrative of his life and art, covering
his Jewish heritage and early life in Troy, New York, and includes a
genealogy. It offers
insight into both the education and practice of a doctor and an author.
A great deal of new material describes Selzer's activities in Korea from
1955-6, when he was a lieutenant in charge of a medical detachment south
of the DMZ. Often using primitive medicine and having inadequate
supplies and help, he treated thousands of natives. His
humanitarian contributions are so vast that they are incalculable.
He returned to his Yale residency, a changed man, and became Chief
Resident. In the ensuing years, he began a busy surgical practice
and started a family, but he was continually being inspired to write.
Volume II begins after his retirement
in 1985 from a career in surgery--thirty-one years in the making--when
he commenced to make his living by his wits alone, "like the fool
in King Lear," he says.
This volumes describes his life-threatening coma in 1991 and the
surprising events that followed. It includes numerous photographs of
Selzer’s family and colleagues at many stages of his life and gives a
timeline of significant events and contributions over the next
twenty-some years, including lectures, plays, and writing
institutes. It is
broken down by his multifaceted contributions: Letters, Diaries, Plays,
Works in Curricula, Lectures and Teaching, and Interviews. It contains
the Comprehensive Selzer
Bibliography (1968-20--) and details his
legacy in the medical humanities through the eyes of colleagues such as
Sherwin Nuland, Howard Spiro, Ralph Horwitz, Bernie Siegel, Andy Graham,
Ashgar Rastegar, Jerome Groopman, Atul Gawande, Leon Kass, Ed
Pellegrino, Bob Brustein, Myra Skarlew, Ian Porter, Anne Hudson Jones,
Rita Charon, Father Tom Phelan, and many others. In October of
2009 I talked with Father Andrew of San Giorgio Maggiore, Venice,
Italy, where Selzer wrote "Diary of an Infidel." He
delighted in correcting a few factual errata and at the same time
confirmed the deep spiritual significance of the monks' lives, lived
out in a long daily presence together.
Selzer
is many things to many different readers, and this book attempts to
reflect that. The general reader will find a poignant coming-of-age
tale of a boy who learned medicine at his father’s knee in
Depression-era Troy, where the waiting room on the first floor of their
house was filled with prostitutes. He lost his father early and was
forced to pull himself up by his bootstraps, just as that father had.
Selzer was a young man with a creative imagination and an artistic soul
(his mother dressed him in knickers and a beret). He knew he was
different from everyone else, so he spent his entire life trying to fit in. Selzer’s life was
not a religious one, but I show how a growing spirituality and mysticism
informed his work.
Writing professionals will learn how a doctor, who is immersed in a
dozen short stories every day, can shape his experience through the
powers of observation and with writing skills into unique art. Medical
professionals will
appreciate learning more about Selzer’s training and his experience
performing surgery inside the Demilitarized Zone in Korea. In looking at
Selzer’s thirty-one years as a surgeon, I discuss how the guiding principle
of Hippocrates’ maxim— “to be useful; but, first, to do no harm”—has
informed his work, even though it can be anathema in any medical
practice. And I endeavor to read Selzer’s work in
light of bioethical and medical issues, describing an American cultural,
social, and medical history from the turn of one century to the next.
My
objectives in this biography are fourfold: I connect Selzer’s works to
his life experiences, showing how his imagination flies; I comment on
his themes and styles; I explicate his role in balancing the
technological outlook of medicine with empathy for patients; and I establish his significance in
the evolving canon known as literature and medicine.
In many
respects Richard Selzer’s life, characterized for over forty years in
his own work, is “an open book,” as he claimed in an email to me.
We have up until now learned more about him from his creative short
stories, unflinching essays, and poignant memoirs than from
any other source. Other times, interviewers have tendered valuable facts and
let Selzer spin stories. He gives to each of them the focused, singular
attention of a great clinician with a patient. While I sometimes note
previous scholarship and the tales it recounts, this work is based on 15
years of original interviews, letters, and emails from Selzer, his
family, childhood friends, and colleagues. In the course of my research,
I have spoken with over 100 intimates and acquaintances for
corroboration and alternate perspectives, and have consulted Selzer’s
uncensored diaries and candid correspondence in the Selzer Archive at the University
of Texas Medical Branch—Galveston. I have augmented Selzer’s compelling
accounts with facts and ideas gleaned from numerous book reviews and
critical pieces.
Aside from the joy of growing closer
to the mind that created some of my favorite works of literature,
Richard Selzer is a pleasure to be with, as a continuum of Selzerian
scholars attests. Their zeal combined with his openness has created
many lasting friendships. To some, Selzer is particularly generous with
nicknames. The two men he refers to as “a brace of Chucks” are Charles
Schuster and Charles Anderson. Peter Josyph signs his early letters “Boswell”
to Selzer’s Dr. Johnson. Faith Lagay and Faith McLellan, two graduate
students who were early editors of his diaries, he affectionately refers
to as “the Faiths 2
. “ Many other notable
authors from different fields have given him their attention. Some who have addressed Selzer’s growing oeuvre
are, but not limited to, Peter Elbow, Ron Carson, Don Faulkner,
David Morris, Robert Davis, Louis Borgenicht, Susan Cheever, Sarah
Boxer, Diane
Ackerman, Anatole Broyard, Annie Dillard, Suzanne Poirier, Angela Carter,
William Cole, John Stone, Edward
Hoagland, and Iliana Alexandra Semmler. See their citations in my Comprehensive Selzer Bibliography
(1968-2008), Richard Selzer: A Literary Biography (Vol. II).
Writing
about Selzer’s life and work has bolstered the careers for scholars in
the humanities as well as in medicine. Indeed, Selzer has blushingly
acknowledged the burgeoning interest in his work, referring to himself
as “Richard Selzer, Incorporated.” Nonetheless, his writings have not
been without controversy, as fully detailed in this biography. They have
addressed headline topics such as right-to-life morality (“Abortion”),
physician-assisted suicide confidentially (“A Question of Mercy”), and
transplant recipient autonomy (“Whither Thou Goest”). He surprises
readers by taking them into unexpected places, from professional
wrestling (“The Masked Marvel’s Last Toehold”) to an Italian monastery
(“Diary of an Infidel”). His exquisitely rendered writing creates
characters with all the frailties and ambiguities of real people,
putting them into situations that shed a profound light on the human
condition. Perhaps that does suggest a writer of “primitive” literary
values, as Selzer claims; it certainly does mark him as a
pre-modernist. It may be a side virtue of having spent a profound and
successful career in medicine that Selzer could be cavalier about
academic trends. It is to his readers’ benefit that he could focus on
the timeless, and likely the highest, theme of fiction.
As Selzer's biographer I have put the events of his life in
chronological order, which helped to square away a few facts. Along the
way I show what contributed to his becoming a surgeon,
first, then a writer. As I researched each stage of Richard Selzer's
life, I felt the pleasure of getting to know him all over again. And
thusly will my readers come to understand an important
contemporary figure in American literature and medicine. But even
the most exhaustively researched biographical work is an interpretative
balancing act. The sometimes blurred mixture of fact and fiction I
document and evaluate means that some things are probably unknowable.
Like most people, Selzer’s memories, self-styled as
"gap-toothed," can be sharp and focused
or foggy. But when he's in storyteller mode the events come to life.
Richard Selzer: A Literary Biography includes these riveting new stories
and adds many other valuable viewpoints. One review of Charles Anderson’s book about
Selzer was entitled “Desperately Seeking Selzer,”1 a play on
the 1985 indie film Desperately Seeking Susan. For all who
have been seeking Selzer rather desperately, I hope that this book has
gotten us closer. —M.Y.S.
-------------
1
Malone,
William. “Desperately Seeking Selzer.” Medical Humanities Review
1990 rev. of Charles Anderson’s Richard Selzer and the Rhetoric of
Surgery.
====================================================
IMAGINE A MAN: THE SURGEON
STORYTELLER
A Literary biography of Richard
Selzer, in two parts.
Part two: Living by his Wits Alone (1985-
)
Foreword
Preface
Lists of Abbreviations,
Maps, and Photographs
Chronology of Events
Introduction
I. Trial and
Tribulation (1985-90)
TWR,IAW
II.
The Carrot of Woe--Yaddo
III.
A Question of Mercy (1991)
IV. The
Bard of Troy (DFT 1992)
V.
Roosting on the Podia (lectures)
VI. Raising the
Dead (1993)
Coma crisis
VII.
The Black Swan (1994)
“the men wept”
VIII. The
Doctor Stories (1998)
book &
play
IX. The Loonies [ministry];
The Exact Location of the Soul
(2001)
X. The Whistler’s Room
(2004)
XI.
Bag of Tricks (teaching at RPI & Yale Med)
XII. The
Illuminati (2005-6) Selzer, Nuland, Siegel
XIII.
The Letters, The Diaries,
Knife Song Korea
(2009-10)
XIV. Legacy:
Works in curricula
(bioethics/humanities), lectures,
teaching, interviews
Conclusion
Endnotes/Works Cited
Acknowledgments
Comprehensive Selzer
Bibliography (1968-20--)
Index
*DVD
interview tapes.
====================================================
Book by Dr. Stripling

Customer Reviews
Average Customer Reviews:
Wonderful
step by step guide through these changing times,
February 28, 2006
I read a great deal of literature while sitting
vigil at a hospice. Dr. Stripling takes you
through our changing times and leads us to
wonderful reference material. She very
gently takes us on a nonjudgmental journey and
helps us to see our own truths and limitations
as we strive to help this world be a more giving
and and caring place. I would hope to see this
book in every high school and college library
and hospice in our country.This resource for high school teachers and
librarians describes ten accessible works of
fiction that may be used to help students
explore a number of contemporary issues in
medicine and bioethics. The selections analyzed
span two centuries, from Mary Shelley's romantic
novel Frankenstein (1818) to Margaret Edson's
play, Wit (1999). Supplemental materials include
a glossary, a list of recommended movies, and a
chronology of key events in literature,
medicine, and science.”–SciTech Book
News
Science,
ethics and literature mesh well, February 4,
2006
This book is a fascinating combination of
science and science fiction. The reader is
transported to the past through Shelley's
"Frankenstein" and into the future with Huxley's
"Brave New World" and Cook's "Coma." We read of
the true ethical dilemma of Feldshuh's "Miss
Evers' Boys" and the disturbing issues of
experimentation with human cloning, stem cell
research, and bioterrorism. Dr. Stripling leads
the reader through a maze of fiction and truth.
She ties it all together, with an occasional
touch of humor, in a narrative that is easy and
interesting to read. This book should be in high
school classrooms and in medical school
curricula. I thoroughly enjoyed the ethical and
medical issues linked with literature.
Topics
for oral or written discussion accompany
synopses of plots, July 6, 2005
Advances in science have brought with them their
own unique ethical and medical dilemmas,
bringing the discipline of philosophy directly
into the world of science. Students from high
school to pre-med receive a well-rounded
introduction to literary references to
bioethical questions, from the beings created by
technology to illness and end of life issues.
Topics for oral or written discussion accompany
synopses of plots. |
Reviewer: School Library Journal
This series promotes a multidisciplinary and
multicultural approach to teaching literature across the
curriculum. Each title includes a chronology of events
related to the literature and the social issues), an
introduction, discussions about the works with plot
synopses, literary analyses, historical context,
further-reading suggestions, lists of topics for written
and oral discussion, and recommended movies and Web
sites.
Worthwhile addition for schools with an integrated
curriculum.–Pat Bender, The Shipley School, Bryn Mawr,
PA
Loved
it!!, May 29, 2005
This book is so 'present tense.' Mahala
Stripling is delving into questions that all of
us must face. I love the timeline; it gives me
perspective outside of the contents of the book,
as well as within. The author has tied together
literary criticism, literature, and unavoidable
21st century decisions within the pages of her
book.
|
|
|
|
BIOETHICS AND MEDICAL
ISSUES IN LITERATURE
GREENWOOD PRESS, 2005
Table of Contents
Foreword Preface Chronology of Events in Literature, Medicine, & Science
Introduction
Chapter 1. Technology's Creature Historical Context, Literary Analysis, and Plot Synopsis of
Shelley's Frankenstein & Hawthorne's "Rappaccini's Daughter"
Chapter 2. A Brave New World Historical Context, Literary Analysis, and Plot Synopsis of
Huxley's Brave New World & Cook's Coma
Chapter 3. Contagions/Isolations Historical Context, Literary Analysis, and Plot Synopsis of Camus' The Plague & Feldshuh's Miss Evers' Boys
Chapter 4. Illness and Culture Historical Context, Literary Analysis, and Plot Synopsis of
Kesey's One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest & Walker's
Possessing the Secret of Joy
Chapter 5. End of Life--Disease and Death
Historical Context, Literary Analysis, and Plot Synopsis of
Updike's Rabbit at Rest & Edson's Wit.
Glossary of Terms: Literary, Medical, and Scientific
Afterword
Appendix A: Recommended Movies
Appendix B: Recommended Internet Sites
Appendix C: Recommended Books and
Appendix D: Recommended Methods for Teaching
Index
TO ORDER:
http://www.greenwood.com/catalog/GR2040.aspx
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0313320403/ref=sr_11_1/102-0287773-4685706?%5Fencoding=UTF8
Book Code: GR2040
ISBN: 0-313-32040-3
April 30, 2005
NOTE: Useful for teaching interdisciplinary studies,
from high school to post-graduate medical school.
SAMPLE CHAPTER:
Chapter 4: Illness and Culture
An Analysis
of Ken Kesey’s One Flew Over
the Cuckoo’s Nest and
Alice Walker’s
Possessing the Secret of Joy
Introduction
Ken Kesey’s One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest
embodies the
rebellious energy of the psychedelic 1960s, a prosperous time
following World War II when drugs were rampant, and the counterculture
challenged authority. A classic description of mental illness,
Cuckoo’s Nest encapsulates Kesey’s experimentation with alternative
forms of perception, while highlighting ethical issues. The setting is
a mental institution where a power struggle exists between the staff and
the patients afflicted with many types of mental illness. Paradoxically,
reading this important novel feels liberating while it asks the
disturbing question, who among us is completely sane? In fact, the
United States
has gone through a slow and arduous process to learn how to identify and
to treat mental disorders. Early on the mentally ill and retarded
roamed the streets, were confined by relatives, or were thrown into
prisons with criminals; later, psychoanalysis led to greater
understanding. Finally, in 1946 the National Institute of Mental Health
was created, recognizing the need to diagnose and to help the mentally
ill. With the advent of mental institutions came radical therapies such
as electroshock treatment and lobotomy. Today these controversial
approaches are often replaced by psychotherapy, the so-called talking cure, and
by drugs such as Prozac and Halcyon. With today’s brain scans and DNA
analysis some mental disorders are more readily detected and treated.
Other topics Cuckoo’s Nest develops concern sexuality and
institutionalization; humor and illness; nursing and group therapy; and
psychiatry and surgery.
Kesey’s Cuckoo’s Nest
continues to influence twenty-first- century medical issues and ethics as
does Walker’s Possessing the Secret of Joy by describing the cultural origins of
mental illness. The female genital mutilation ritual Walker describes
in a certain African culture illustrates how society constructs
practices that inflict psychological trauma and have long-term physical
consequences. The FGM surgical procedure viewed as sane in one
culture is judged unethical and criminally insane in others, linking
health and human rights. Increasing immigration brings the surgical
ritual, once commonplace in Puritan times, back to the United States. In addition,
worldwide awareness causes petitioners seeking asylum based on sexual
discrimination to flock to the United States.
Possessing
the Secret of Joy also teaches morality lessons and the
importance of the mother-child relationship all within the context of
cultural relativism and Social Darwinism. The main issue, however, is of
global concern, how human rights violations perpetuate women’s mental
and physical health problems. In the Western world the long history in
which women were seen as objects springs from Aristotle’s view that
women were unfinished men. This thinking was at the heart of early
Greek medical practices such as female circumcision, just as, ironically,
was Hippocrates’ “first, to do not harm” mandate. Many cultures continue
to subjugate women to fundamentalist beliefs, denying them equal
protection under the law, even though the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human
Rights states that human rights are inalienable: “No one shall be
subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or
punishment” (United Nations General Assembly Resolution 1948).
Both Kesey and Walker show how illness derives from culture as well as
from disease, and that our views on normalcy depend on the culture and
the time in which we live. While Possessing the Secret of Joy projects issues that for some
may be difficult to explore at first, by putting a face onto the estimated
100 million women worldwide who have
undergone FGM, Walker has crafted a chilling book of literary
importance.
The ward door opened, and the
black boys wheeled in this Gurney with a chart at the bottom that said
in heavy black letters, MC MURPHY, RANDLE P. POST-OPERATIVE. And below
this was written in ink, LOBOTOMY.
—Cuckoo’s Nest
Ken Kesey’s One Flew Over
the Cuckoo’s Nest
(1962)
Historical Context
Ken Kesey (1935-2001), born in Colorado and reared in Oregon,
appreciated nature and loved wrestling. He received a degree in speech and
communication from the University of Oregon. Then, with a Woodrow
Wilson Scholarship, he enrolled in the Stanford University Creative
Writing program. While a graduate student, he participated in
life-altering psychology department research involving psilocybin,
mescaline, amphetamine, and LSD. For several weeks Kesey, a
24-year-old paid research volunteer, ingested these
mind-expanding drugs. Later, as a Veteran’s Administration
psychiatric ward orderly on the night shift, he observed that many of
the patients, rather than being crazy, were just nonconformists in a
sterile environment. While drug-induced, Kesey hallucinated about an
Indian sweeping the floors, who became “Chief Broom,” his schizophrenic
narrator in One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest. His novel was an
immediate success, allowing Kesey and his wife Faye to buy a farm that
became a site for an influential bohemian community experimenting with
drugs, believing altered mental states could improve society. Because
Kesey’s parties were notorious for illegal drug use, he was soon
arrested and jailed for several months. Nonetheless, with his new fame,
Kesey drew the attention of Neal Cassady (hero of Jack Kerouac’s On
the Road) and others, and soon the hippie-aesthetic, antiwar group
the Merry Pranksters was formed, exploding into the psychedelic era.
In 1964 the notorious Pranksters drove cross-country in a Day Glo bus,
obstensively to see the New York World’s Fair, but it became instead a
creative adventure. Cassady drove the bus, and its riders dropped acid
and smoked marijuana along the journey, which was filmed for posterity.
The bus became a metaphor for “living your art,” and the saying “You’re
either on the bus or you’re off the bus,” was Beat Generation lingo for
creative tripping. The exploits of the Pranksters are the subject of
Tom Wolfe’s The Electric Kool-Aid Acid Test (1968), a book
voraciously consumed by antiestablishment hippies in search of the
universe within. Kesey went on to write other novels, but none achieved
the success of Cuckoo’s Nest, which subsequently influenced
popular culture with its stage and film productions. Late in life,
Kesey, the pied piper of the psychedelic era, took drugs only for his
diabetes and hepatitis C, finding the pure adrenaline of experiencing
nature enough. He died on November 10, 2001, in Pleasant Hill, Oregon,
following surgery for liver cancer.
Cuckoo’s Nest continues to be a prototypical depiction of mental
illness by describing various mental disabilities as well as the legal
and ethical issues arising from them. The novel’s publication brought to
the American consciousness what a slow and arduous process it has been
to define and to devise treatment for mental disorders. From Colonial
times, before the proper diagnosis of the mentally ill and retarded,
madmen roamed free. Alternatively, shamed families cruelly locked
abnormal relatives in an attic or chained them to a wall. Society’s
first priority was to feel safe, then to punish the evil they believed
inherent in the mentally ill. The very first mental institutions were
small, primitive nontherapeutic holding facilities, such as the one
founded in Williamsburg, Virginia, in 1773. Until larger mental asylums
were created, particularly troublesome individuals—including the poor—
were incarcerated with criminals or sent to the poorhouse.
Over time many unusual theories have been espoused regarding the diagnosis and
treatment of mental illness. In the late 1700s, Philadelphia’s Dr.
Benjamin Rush, a signer of the Declaration of Independence and the
Father of American Psychiatry, challenged demonic causation and
believed moral treatment that controlled the environment would cure
insanity in acute patients. Thinking brain arterial disease resulting
from gluttony caused mental illness, he advocated a restricted diet,
extensive bleeding, emetics to encourage vomiting, and hot or cold
showers to slow metabolism. He also invented the gyrator, a spinning
chair or plank upon which the patient was tied, designed to increase the
brain’s blood supply. Rush’s Medical Inquiries and Observations upon
the Diseases of the Mind made him a revolutionary authority on
madness, and he became a popular lecturer. Much later, in the
mid-1800s, Christian social reformer Dorothea Dix (1802–87) raised money to establish the first state mental
institution in Massachusetts after she saw the mentally ill housed with
criminals in unsanitary conditions. Her efforts brought national focus
upon human rights abuses. Since that time, numerous civil rights laws
help differentiate criminals from the mentally ill who are often
involuntarily committed upon proof they would be a danger to themselves
or others. With an increased awareness of civil liberties also came an
individual’s right to refuse treatment. State-specific rules apply to
involuntarily committing and treating teenagers. The remedy for being
confined against a person’s will is to have a lawyer file a habeas
corpus petition with the court asking the institution to show cause
why that person should be held. Thus, insanity (lacking mental
capacity) is foremost a legal term, not a medical one.
In the late nineteenth century the upper class with socially acceptable
nervous diseases oftentimes voluntarily availed themselves of short
and long-term residencies, such as in Philadelphia neurologist S. Weir
Mitchell’s rest cure involving isolation, electrical massage, and
a milk diet. Charlotte Perkins Gillman in “The Yellow Wallpaper”
chronicles her incipient insanity and the “wise man” who withdrew her
from all active stimulation by putting her to bed to rest. At the end
of her treatment, she was ordered to return to domestic life and only
"have but two hours' intellectual life a day" and "never to touch pen,
brush, or pencil again.” After three months these conditions pressed her “near
the borderline of utter mental ruin,” she wrote later (“Why I Wrote 'The
Yellow Wallpaper'"). Ironically, after Dr. Mitchell read her account
of descending slowly into madness and the ineffective cure, he altered
his future treatment for neurasthenia (meaning “tired nerves”) and
melancholia (depression). Another popular “spa treatment” to calm
agitation was hydrotherapy, which was more than a nice warm
bath. For instance, one practice was to wrap an agitated patient in
cold (50 degree), wet sheets. A very disturbed patient could be placed
in a continuous bath 18 hours a day for 2-3 weeks—or
whatever it took to change the aberrant behavior. The dangers of
hydrotherapy were hypothermia, convulsions, and even drowning.
Another part of U.S. history, the 1920s eugenics movement,
unfortunately influenced the1940s Nazi practice of sterilizing the
feebleminded. In Germany it led to euthanizing the congenitally inferior in order to
purify the population. The movement began after the American Civil War
when medical professionals, who saw few results from the Moral
Movement, embraced the idea of Social Darwinism. Patients were being
increasingly subdued by drugs such as chloroform, bromides, and ether,
and 30 states, with the support of prominent Americans, legalized
forced sterilization. In Virginia, Carrie Buck was an
institutionalized18-year-old unwed mother, whose mother and child were
also feebleminded. She was forcibly sterilized under Virginia’s 1924
eugenics law. Her case was appealed to the Supreme Court, claiming that
the plaintiff, under the Fourteenth Amendment, was denied due process
and equal protection of the laws. However, Supreme Court Justice Oliver
Wendell Holmes in Buck v. Bell (1927) upheld the state
eugenics law, declaring “three generations of imbeciles are
enough.” With this precedent, over the next 40 years 60,000
people nationwide were sterilized for other types of unacceptable
behaviors or conditions, such as alcoholism, promiscuity, criminal acts,
epilepsy, and running away from home. In an attempt to make
restitution, several governors have formally apologized to their states’
eugenics victims.
Besides sterilization procedures performed for the greater good, in
the 1930s Washington D.C. neuropsychiatrist Dr. Walter Freeman pioneered
his drastic ice-pick psychosurgery. Also known as lobotomy,
it initially involved partially destroying one of the brain’s frontal
lobes, thus causing great disfiguration. Freeman explains in “Glimpses
of Postlobotomy Personalities” how, when all else fails, the desired
change in the patient’s anxious and fearful personality is effected:
“Without the long, painful process of developing insight in the
patients, psychosurgery somehow relieves them of their sufferings and
makes it possible for them to go back to their homes and to survive in
the very environment in which their disorders developed “(Robinson and
Freeman, 15). In his case studies, however, the postoperative realities sound
grim. Patients often were described as slothful, irritable, and angry.
Nonetheless, in A History of Psychiatry Edward Shorter points
out, “The idea of operating on the brain to cure madness does not seem
intrinsically unreasonable. Physicians have always intuited that a
physical intervention in the brain, perhaps cutting some tract causing
compulsive behavior or removing a center producing some malignant
protein, might put an end to a pattern of psychosis” (Shorter, 225). The
relationship between the brain and the mind is being continually
studied, of course, with new methods of brain imaging such as MRI
(magnetic resonance imaging), CT (computerized-tomography), and PET
(positron-emission-tomography) proving immensely helpful in diagnosing
and mapping progressive diseases. Although the adverse publicity
arising from Cuckoo’s Nest caused lobotomy to be largely replaced
with antipsychotic drugs, today successful psychosurgeries like
cingulotomy relieve severe compulsive neuroses and depression.
Besides psychosurgery, electroshock therapy (ECT) has proved a valuable
psychiatric treatment for mental illness. In 1938, after an earlier
scientist observed that schizophrenics seemed symptom-free following
seizures, Italian scientists Cereletti and Bini devised electroshock
therapy as an efficient way to manage uncontrollable patients. Today, a
severely depressed patient receiving ECT, administered in a series of
treatments, has an intravenous relaxant administered and a mouth guard inserted
before an anesthetic renders him unconscious. The airway is protected,
and electrodes are connected with conducting jelly on the temples.
Electric current comparable to a 60-watt bulb shoots through the brain
causing a 20-second grand-mal seizure. The patient wakes about
30-minutes later, confused and disoriented, with a headache and
short-term memory loss. In essence, ECT helps disturbed patients regain
the control necessary to enter into a therapeutic relationship.
Short-term impaired memory follows; complications from possible
fractures and dislocations caused by muscle contractions are a thing of
the past. For generations Kesey’s Cuckoo’s Nest inflamed the
public consciousness by depicting ECT as a means to punish misbehaving
patients, easily associating it with electrocution. Over the years
attempts to pass state laws banning ECT have failed. As horrific as it
sounds, some neuropsychiatrists still find ECT to be an effective
treatment for severely depressed and suicidal patients, especially after
psychotherapy and slow-acting, cyclical drug regimens fail. Depression,
more than a character weakness and feeling just down, is a brain
disease often detectable on a PET scan that indicates receptor chemistry
abnormality. It affects millions of Americans who often feel ashamed
they cannot pull themselves up by their bootstraps. Hence, they often
fail to seek help. New electromagnetic brain treatments, easily applied
and without side effects, are proving effective, and recent NIH DNA
studies indicate a 50 percent to 80 percent genetic component. In 2003 scientists, after
working decades, documented a clear link between a gene controlling
serotonin levels in the brain and depression, leading to possible new
drugs. Tying genes with behavior, scientists say depression has roots
in both genetics and personal history (i.e., nurture and nature).
The beginning of World War II brought more awareness to mental and emotional
problems with more than a million inductees rejected for military duty as
unsound. This was shocking evidence of public fragility. Returning
servicemen, on the other hand, benefited both from medical advances,
such as penicillin and blood banking, as well as from psychiatric
screening. Subsequently, the number of psychologists proliferated and
terms such as post-traumatic stress disorder were coined. PTSD,
formerly referred to as battle fatigue or shell shock, is not new,
but the term continues to be applied to returning soldiers with ongoing
problems such as loss of concentration, sleep disturbances, nightmares,
flashbacks, intrusive thoughts, and emotional stress. This spotlight on
identifying prospective mental disorders brought about the National
Institute for Mental Health in 1949, advocating more study on the origin
of mental illness, its diagnosis, and its treatment. For the first time—in
the place of hospitalization—the new drug chlorpromazine was used to
relieve anxiety and control delusions. Thorazine, the prescription
straitjacket, was used to treat and ameliorate depressive or compulsive
disorders. With the widespread use of these drugs and others, the
psychopharmaceutical revolution in mental health care began.
Ironically, as the 1950s rolled in, the counterculture movement looked
to their drugs, such as LSD and peyote, to escape from the conventional
rationality.
The psychiatric climate in the 1960s when Cuckoo’s Nest was
published included two main schools of thought: the behaviorists and the
humanists. A leading American behaviorist, B.F. Skinner (1904-90),
believed we could solve major mental problems by improving our
understanding of human conditioning. When he objectively observed
aberrant behavior, he felt it should be ignored or punished. Good
behavior, he thought, could be positively conditioned with encouragement
and reward. Behaviorists tended to pigeonhole patients into categories
in which they would be forever tracked. The other major view of the
time came from the humanists who hesitated to label the patient, but who
also socially constructed mental illness. For example, Scottish
psychiatrist R.D. Laing (1927-89),
“the philosopher of madness,” believed that a schizophrenic only acted
abnormally as a mechanism to cope with a stressful situation. This view
is increasingly seen as outdated as work is underway to confirm a genetic
mutation as the disease’s cause. Two million American schizophrenics
have lost touch with reality, hallucinate, and suffer from this
disabling disease. Laing vehemently opposed the dehumanizing use of ECT
and lobotomy. American psychiatrist Thomas S. Szasz (born 1920) took
humanism a step further by writing about “the myth of mental illness”
and the ethical and moral issues physicians contend with. He advocates
patient autonomy, including the right to refuse involuntary
“imprisonment” and treatment. For better or worse, in recent times
mental patients have greater civil rights, and more scrutiny is given to
psychiatric institution admission methods, leaving the standard five-day
admission to include a quick psychiatric evaluation, drug readjustment,
and then release. The result is that a large population of mental patients
is not benefiting from lengthy psychotherapeutic interactions with
caring psychiatrists and, therefore, is left to fend for itself, often on
the street.
Mental institutions in the1970s, due
in part to Cuckoo’s Nest’s adverse publicity that fostered
hostility against authority, were seen as warehouses that inflicted
physical and sexual abuse on patients. With the current trend toward
deinstitutionalization, more patients are treated on an outpatient basis
with psychotropic drugs. There are new ways to diagnose and many other
types of treatment for mental illness, of course, besides psychosurgery, ECT, drugs, and confinement. In the early part of the twentieth century
American psychotherapy, which tended to classify disorders by symptoms
rather than causations, proliferated. It stemmed in part from the work
of Austrian Sigmund Freud (1856-1939),
the Father of
Psychoanalysis.
Psychotherapy
slowly became popular and arguably successful. Some of the concepts
Freud's talk therapy popularized, as translated, included the
Oedipus
complex; the id, ego, and superego; anxiety and defense mechanisms;
repression, displacement, and rejection; and the libido and death
instinct. His therapeutical approaches include dream analysis, free
association, and transference. Indeed, Freud even made the terms hysteria and
penis envy household words, but today criticism of his unorthodox
research methods and emphasis on sexuality makes his practices less
relevant. Currently, one in four American adults seeks professional
psychological advice some time during his or her life for services ranging
from treating severe depression to counseling on life strategies. The
stigma is gone. New disorders, some consider fads, are continually being
defined, including the seemingly pervasive attention deficit
disorder with hyperactivity (ADHD). In 1995, 2.5 million American children were
on Ritalin. In the 1980s multiple personality disorder (MPD) became
epidemic. In essence, critics claim personality traits formerly seen as
eccentric or troublesome are being pathologized, causing the field of
psychiatry to grow. Again for better or for worse, in recent times drug
therapy—even with its side effects—continues to replace lengthy
patient-oriented talk sessions as the gold standard of care.
Because
the history of mental illness reaches back as far as the written word,
this abbreviated version provides merely a snapshot illumination of
specific issues in Cuckoo’s Nest. Over the centuries attempts to
treat madness have, from our perspective today, seemed cruel and
unusual. Besides, with pathology poorly defined, odd behavior alone
would be cause for confinement. Today, while new methods advance
understanding and care, a significant part of the future of mental
illness diagnosis may lie in constant revelations arising from brain
imaging and the deciphered genome, with the promise of targeted
treatments. Nonetheless, even with vast knowledge of the human body,
Edward Shorter adds, “Science wanders astray easily in the world of
quotidian anxiety and sadness, in the obsessive traits of behavior and
the misfiring personality types that are the lot of humankind. Here the
genetic trail grows dim and the neurotransmitters evaporate. Biology
counts for little, culture and socialization for lots” (A History of
Psychiatry,
288). The nature versus nurture
debate is very much alive.
Literary Analysis
Cuckoo’s Nest, one
of the most influential novels of the twentieth century, derives from
Ken Kesey’s observations at a mental institution. Although it is a
popular myth that Cuckoo’s Nest sprung full-blown from Kesey’s
drug-induced state, he admits only some of it was inspired that way.
Written during the post-World War II era of the psychedelic 1960s—when
the U.S. faced a Communist threat—he wanted his black satire’s
good v. evil plot, rich with symbols, literary allusions, and bioethical
and medical issues, to show how individuals must stand up to authority
so their rights are not quashed by government control. As a
prototypical depiction of mental illness, Cuckoo’s Nest describes
how the mentally ill were treated, and this analysis focuses on the
effects of the therapies applied at the time.
Chief Bromden’s observations
as narrator make him the most important character in the novel. The
“deaf and dumb” American Indian, who has seen his lands taken away to
build a hydroelectric dam and his family destroyed, tells the story, at
first in a flashback sequence and then in hallucinatory visions. It is
possible to trace throughout the novel his self-evolving passage out of
the fog of schizophrenia. The action centers on the free-spirited
Randle P. McMurphy (Mack), who of course personifies the counterculture
Beat Generation. He “was a giant come out of the sky to save us from
the Combine,” the Big Chief believes. Mack faces off against Nurse
Ratched, who personifies governmental authority and repression, and in
whom the Combine (evil government forces seeking conformity)
culminates. The Combine includes Ratched’s network of handpicked and
personally trained nurses, doctors, and aides. Mack, “crazy like a fox,”
has “capitalist intent “ in feigning mental illness to leave a prison
work farm. However much of a charming con man he appears to be, though, in
setting up gambling opportunities, his antiauthoritarian rebelliousness
makes him an imperfect antihero. Because he has been involuntarily
committed by the prison, Ratched has absolute power to hold him until
she deems him cured. But most of the other Acute patients who are deemed
hard-core and seek
institutional discipline can release themselves. In his battle with his
nemesis, Nurse Ratched (symbolically a ratchet, a tool controlling by degree), he appears to be both a classic
psychopath and a cocky comic book figure. Regardless of the impurity of
Mack's self-serving hustling instincts, his antagonizing Ratched allows him
to grow and the other patients to be liberated. Considering the complexity
of mental states, it is ambiguous whether he extended his stay (breaking
the nurses’ station window twice) for his greed or for solidarity with
the patients. Is he the victim of an ill-conceived plan or a martyr?
While Mack “walks out of step; hears another drum,” a literary
reference to Henry David Thoreau that is a lietmotif symbolizing
individualism, the Chief stands for the vanishing American Indian, an
invisible man diminished by white society. Kesey goes into great detail
about how the Chief’s disintegrating culture has paralyzed him into
catatonia, effecting a split personality and sporadic loss of reality.
The Chief has been on the ward the longest; Mack is the new patient.
Each is putting on an act: the Chief’s hallucinatory insights on
hospital activities reflect his silent savvy; Mack’s noisy bravado
either agitates or rallies patients by challenging Ratched’s matriarchal
authority. Kesey's contrasting the Chief and Mack causes interest.
But the most ingenious part of the novel is the ability to trace
Mack’s influence on the Chief. Inextricably linking mental prowess and
physical size, the Chief in his mind’s eye appears to grow physically
bigger as he becomes mentally released from his schizophrenic fog. In
an example of the complexity of Mack’s motives, he uses the Chief to
lift the control room panel as the basis of a bet, but at the same time
it empowers the Chief.
The mental institution culture in Cuckoo’s Nest reveals how the
lines between sanity and insanity are often blurred. It describes many
types of illness, divided between the Acutes and the Chronics, and
includes the obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) patient who cannot get
dirty, two epileptics with opposing drug administration problems,
cowering depressives, self-mutilating passive-aggressives, hallucinating
schizophrenics, and troublemaking psychopaths. In a group therapy
meeting Mack sets out to challenge authority by persuading most of the
patients to vote to watch the World Series during their work detail.
Although a democratic vote is taken—modeling the type of behavior needed
on the outside--Ratched wields her authority and cuts the power to the
set. The patients then gather in front of it in a rebellious sit-in.
The Chief tacitly observes they would all appear crazy to an outsider.
Talk therapies based on ward log entries are run like confrontational
pecking parties, with the patients acting like scared rabbits.
Harding and others both fear Ratched, viewed as a surrogate wife and mother,
and want her to keep them in their place. Throughout the novel women are
mostly portrayed as dominating “ballcutters” or submissive
pleasure-givers.
Dale Harding, symbolizing the voice of reason as president of the
Patients’ Council, explains the system and treatments like
electroshock therapy and lobotomy. What may be inexplicable, though, is
the therapeutic role of nature and the healing power of laughter seen
throughout the novel. In a classic road literature scenario,
Mack and the other patients on a fishing trip learn and grow along the
way as they face challenges and overcome obstacles. Mack laughs at
fishing trip mishaps, the Chief tells us,
Because he knows you have to laugh at the things that hurt
you just to keep yourself in balance, just to keep the world from
running you plumb crazy. He knows there’s a painful side; he knows my
thumb smarts and his girl friend has a bruised breast and the doctor
is losing his glasses, but he won’t let the pain blot out the humor
no more’n he’ll let the humor blot out the pain.
The contagious laughter pumped the men up, as it “rang out on the
water in ever-widening circles.” Laughter, in fact, as a proponent of
the holistic mind-body-spirit approach to health and healing, may relieve pain
and renew hope. In 1964 Dr. Norman Cousins, diagnosed with the
crippling and degenerative disease ankolysing spodylitis, with
his doctor’s permission removed himself from the clinical
environment and checked into a hotel for combination therapy comprised
of belly laughter (watching Marx Brothers films) and taking massive
doses of vitamin C. His disease went into remission. He did not
necessarily reject scientific, Western medicine that documents how
positive emotions affect the adrenal glands and the endocrine system,
and how the placebo effect increases the mind’s willpower over
matter. Cousins, in writing up his account in Anatomy of an Illness
(1981), answers critics and leaves others to speculate about his
alternative therapy, “Laughter may or may not activate the endorphins
or enhance respiration, as some medical researchers contend. What seems
clear, however, is that laughter is an antidote to apprehension and
panic.” He was, in effect, retaking control of his life. Since
Cousin’s classic book, others have espoused hope, faith, and love as
therapeutic values, such as Bernie Siegel’s Love, Medicine & Miracles.
Nonetheless, when considering alternative or holistic approaches to
medicine, it is wise to beware of age-old quackery.
Mack’s therapeutic role—if
it can be called such—demonstrates the importance of levity as well as
of maintaining some self-respect in institutional living. Unfortunately,
in Ratched’s therapeutic community her dehumanizing and belittling ways
“ballcut” all men, including Dr. Spivey. Contrary to today's
conventional wisdom, she controls the population by
diminishing the men’s self-esteem. She also administers narcotic drugs daily.
Her threats of using
electroshock therapy and lobotomy as punishment would now be seen as
unethical, at the least. Mack progressively builds up their masculine confidence.
But
then he lets them down, until in one last hurrah he puts his personal
interests aside when he and the Chief protect George in a fistfight with
the black aides who try to give him an enema. Although Ratched gives
Mack a chance to get out of ECT as punishment by admitting he has been
wrong, in a pivotal show of selfless solidarity, he refuses, feeling it
would be the same as confessing to a “plot to overthrow the
government.” As he undergoes a series of ECT in the Disturbed Ward, his
bravado creates a heroic legendary status that Ratched fears. In a
psychological ploy to regain control, she brings him back to the ward
where she can watch him—and plot.
Sexuality is also a part of
life—even in an institution. Mack arranges for Billy Bibbit, 31
but mentally an adolescent controlled by his mother, to lose his
virginity to a smuggled-in prostitute during a drunken evening on the
ward. Mack’s attempt to restore a manly independence in the men may
release some from psychosomatic illness; however, for Billy, things are
not that simple. Ratched, in her zeal to keep things under control,
shames him into extreme guilt. Fearful of his mother, he commits
suicide. At this point Cuckoo Nest’s rich literary references to
Melville culminate in Moby Dick’s good versus evil overtones and in a
suggestion of Billy Budd’s stuttering, innocent protagonist. Applying
Darwinian reasoning to the pecking order of the mental ward, Ratched’s
“ballcutting” approach mandates that only the fittest survive. So Mack
viciously attacks Ratched for Billy’s suicide, leading to her final
retaliation: his lobotomy. What makes Kesey’s dramatization so
compelling, however, is the way Christian imagery used throughout the
novel coalesces into his final redemption: Mack is the martyred Christ
who has compromised authority and released the patients from the
Combine’s control of them. In fact, Cuckoo’s Nest’s grotesque
description is so compelling it took lobotomy as therapeutic
psychosurgery underground, until today when updated versions of it are
deemed acceptable, beneficial treatments. In the end, the Chief’s
releasing Mack from his vegetative state and escaping out into a new
life show the healing power of individuals. Nonetheless, life is messy,
and Kesey’s ambiguous conclusion causes speculation that the Combine,
bigger than Nurse Ratched and her mental institution, cannot be so
easily defeated.
The allegorical title, One Flew
Over the Cuckoo’s Nest, comes from a nursery rhyme the Chief
recites in part 4:
Ting. Tingle, tingle,
tremble toes, she’s a good fisherman, catches hens, puts ‘em inna
pens . . . wire blier, limber lock, three geese inna flock . . . one
flew east, one flew west, one flew over the cuckoo’s nest . . .
O-U-T spells out . . . goose swoops down and plucks you
out.
The cuckoo’s nest
is the mental hospital; Ratched “tremble toes” pecks at the men; the
Bull Goose Loony Mack “plucks out” the Chief , who embodies Mack’s spirit
as he makes his hopeful escape out into the moonlight. Kesey’s
cautionary tale, a metaphor for how society socially constructs its
attitudes toward mental illness, makes us question, conversely, how
mental illness derives from culture as well as from disease. What is
more clearly understood, however, is that views of insanity change in
our culture, and that therapies go in and out of fashion. Cuckoo’s
Nest makes us wonder how we should balance mental health care’s need
to control and to conform with maintaining individual rights. In Kesey’s
novel, the psychiatric staff are not always the good guys, and the
patients are often more complicated than they first appear. With
generational fluctuations in psychiatric perception, it is necessary to
ask, by whose idea of normal should we be measured?
Synopsis of the Novel
An Oregon state mental
institution in the 1960s is the scene for a contest of wills between the
staff and the inmates. The catatonic Native American Indian Chief
Bromden (Chief Broom) narrates One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest
even though he appears deaf and mute. Diagnosed with delusional
paranoia, while in a fog and feeling helpless, he fears the Combine
controls everything. The driving force in the mental institution is the
militaristic Nurse Ratched (the Big Nurse), who wields her authority
severely over everyone, including the professional medical staff, the
black boy aides, and the patients. The new patient, Randle P. McMurphy
(Mack), whom the court ruled a psychopathic prisoner, has feigned
insanity to be transferred from Pendleton Work Farm. In his cocky, in-your-face manner, he introduces himself as “a gambling fool” to other
asylum inmates. Using his charm, he craftily sets them up as pigeons to
pluck in card games. The patients are divided into the incurable
Chronics like the big half-breed Chief, who is a flawed product of
the Combine, and the curable Acutes who Nurse Ratched eggs on,
attacking them where they are most vulnerable. A patient may come in as an Acute
and then be turned into a robotic Chronic (Walker, Wheeler, or
Vegetable) after being punished in the Shock Shop with electroshock
treatments or with the permanent disfiguration of psychosurgery
(lobotomy). Threats with these therapies enforce cooperation while
keeping the two groups separated. Ratched has already assessed Mac as a
troublemaker who will manipulate the system and disrupt the mental ward.
She runs a tight ship—shunning outside disturbances—to keep the
precision asylum machinery (the Combine) humming. Her ideal medical
staff, the Chief tells us, has been hand-picked and after years of
training molded to suit her needs, staying “in contact on a high-voltage
wavelength of hate.” She taught them her way to get inmates into shape
was to patiently “wait for a little advantage . . . then twist the rope
and keep the pressure steady.”
Through the fog of his schizophrenia the Big Chief keenly
watches the new admission, McMurphy, in the group psychotherapy meeting.
Ratched begins the discussion from a topic logged in the ward book
having to do with Dale Harding’s promiscuous, well-endowed young wife,
his feelings of inferiority, and resultant sexual dysfunction. He is a
probable case of situational madness resulting from his wife’s
emasculating nature. Mack had initially challenged Harding, the
effeminate, college-educated president of the Patients’ Council, for the
role of the Bull Goose Loony or the alpha male, but they soon become
friendly when Harding proves a valuable source of information. Mack
garners the most interest in the meeting, however, when Ratched
introduces him as a recipient of the Distinguished Service Cross in
Korea for leading a Communist prison camp escape. Subsequently, he was
dishonorably discharged for insubordination and later arrested for
drunkenness, gambling, assault and battery, and statutory rape. Mack
refutes only the latter. Dr. Spivey, the ward doctor, misaddresses him
as “Mr. McMurry”-- Ratched’s attempt to demoralize Mack through
improperly pronouncing his name—and looks into his file, reading the
diagnosis: “repeated outbreaks of passion that suggest the
possible diagnosis of psychopath.” In retaliation, Mack tries to
intimidate Ratched. Meanwhile, Dr. Spivey explains the group meeting
protocol and why a democratic therapeutic community, as a prototype of
the outside world, requires conformity that will allow them to return to
the outside. The patients in group therapy are encouraged to discuss
and confess, revealing the secrets of the subconscious. Rather than
being Freud-inspired talk therapy, though, it turns out to be a
Ratched-led pecking party, and this time Harding is unmercifully
grilled and shamed. Hearing all this and watching an agitated patient
receive a subduing hip shot, Mack, in the end, thinks it might be smart
to carefully assess the situation, before he “makes any kind of play." He enters into a lengthy dialogue with Harding and others about Ratched’s role in emasculating them, culminating in a bet that he will
“get her goat” within a week.
Mack’s rebellious nature takes over as he begins rallying
the patients and gaining hero status by challenging Ratched’s authority
and by procuring special favors for them. For example, in the shower
room Mack complains to a black orderly about the ward policy that he can
brush his teeth at only a certain time, and when Ratched comes in, he tells
her his clothes were taken and threatens to drop his towel. Ratched
angrily calls for new clothes. Further taunting Ratched, Mack complains
about loud ward music overriding his conversation while gambling for
cigarettes; however, Ratched says it consoles the hard-of-hearing older
patients. Mack then presses to move his game to the old tub room, no
longer in use because drugs have replaced hydrotherapy. She refuses, but
Mack persuades Dr. Spivey to change the venue. Mack continues to break
the rules by using real money (not cigarettes) to play Monopoly. He
takes bets on the World Series. In a key vote to watch the World
Series, Mack gets the Big Chief to raise his hand. Ratched balks at the
schedule change, and the Acutes do a sit-in protest in front of the TV
set. With each loss of authority Ratched patiently, coldly waits: “she
has all the power of the Combine behind her.”
In
part 2 Ratched is suspicious of the Big Chief’s new cognitive
responsiveness, and even though he still exhibits paranoia, his
schizophrenic fog may be lifting. In a staff meeting, the question
arises whether Mack is a clever con man or a violent psychopath. Ratched
convinces others that sending Mack to the Disturbed Ward would only
enhance his hero status; therefore, she favors keeping him in the
general population where, before long, he will show his own avarice and
cowardice. The Chief, in his narration, theorizes Mack truly is an
extraordinary man, capable of resisting the Combine. Noting aberrant
staff actions, however, he questions who in the mental institution is
completely sane. Mack’s leadership continues to embolden the Acutes.
He has given them a reason “to wake up, and they now question ward
policies, such as on rationing cigarettes. Then Mack, in a catch-22,
backs off when he realizes, as an involuntarily committed patient,
Ratched decides if he is cured or not (released or not). By failing to
rally forces against Ratched, he disheartens the patients, possibly
leading to Cheswick’s suicide. Ward privileges are revoked, and therapy
sessions return to silence.
Mack witnesses an
epileptic seizure, learning about the side effects of the drug that may
prevent it, as well as the staff wielding its power through using
electroshock therapy (“brain burning”), which, ironically, is actually
the induction of a seizure. Mack is shocked to learn that Harding,
Billy, and others have voluntarily committed themselves, and are free to
leave at any time. It is only their fears of the outside world that keep
them there. Ratched, feeling her control returned, smugly informs the men
that they must have the privilege of using the tub room for card playing
taken away as punishment for their insurrections, and that having a
sense of order and discipline will help them adjust to societal rules in
the outside world. Convinced she had the final victory and control over
Mack, Ratched is startled to see him plunge his hand through the glass
window of the nurses’ station, extracting one of his own cigarettes. She
does not retaliate, but bides her time.
In part 3 sports are
introduced, causing the men to renew their muscle-flexing and to build
self-esteem. Being denied day passes, Mack again puts his hand through Ratched’s glass window. Tension builds as Mack’s rebelliousness
increases. At this time, he recruits the patients to go on a supervised
deep-sea fishing trip, but Ratched frightens the men. Chief Bromden
really wants to go, but knows he will blow his cover by indicating so.
Acting deaf has allowed him to hear. It started as a child when
outside people who saw an American Indian as invisible quit listening to
him. When Indian land was seized to make a hydroelectric dam, the
government had his white mother, instead of his chief father, sign the
deal. Chief Broom begins to emerge from his silence one night when Mack
offers him some gum, and he replies, “Thank you.” A conversation
ensues, and Mack works on the Chief’s ego to convince him to throw the
tub room control panel out the window for escape.
Mack pushes to arrange
a deep-sea fishing trip, signing up the Chief as the only Chronic
going. With great effort, because Ratched had tried to “damp the man out
of them,” Mack gets the quota needed for the trip. But, when only one
chaperone shows up, the prostitute Candy Starr, Dr. Spivey must step
forward as the second chaperone. All the way to the dock, the men show
bravado and courage, and instinctively a manliness once derailed
returns. They surpass many obstacles on their road trip to the sea; in
the end, without a properly signed waiver, they even hijack a boat. The
fishing trip, complete with victorious fishing and hearty camaraderie,
has returned a natural masculinity to formerly emasculated men. And
laughter “started slow and pumped itself full, swelling the men bigger
and bigger.” Mack watches as the men appear to slowly take back their
lives. Billy and Candy become smitten, and Mack invites her to the
mental institution on Saturday.
Back at the mental
institution in part 4, Ratched plots to discredit Mack by disclosing to
the patients how much money he is making on them from gambling and
arranging games and trips. Her ploy seems to be working, until Mack and
Chief Bromden defend George Sorenson in a fistfight with the black
orderlies. As punishment, they receive EST in the Disturbed Ward, which
Mack compares to electrocution. Because he will not relent, but rather
acts heroically, Ratched orders more EST for Mack. When he begins to
attain legendary status, Ratched brings him back to her ward where she
works on making him appear weak. Still rebellious, Mack arranges for
Billy to lose his virginity to Candy during a drunken night on the ward.
The other patients urge Mack to escape rather than face further
repercussion from Ratched. But, drugged and drunk, he falls asleep. In
the morning, Ratched takes it all in and threatens to tell Billy’s
mother about his encounter with Candy. When Billy cuts his throat, Mack
attacks Ratched. In retaliation, she has him lobotomized. Bromden
humanely releases Mack from his vegetative state by suffocating him, and
he escapes back out into his life.
Questions for
oral and written discussion:
1. What
role did the rebellious Merry Pranksters have in defining the
counterculture into which Cuckoo's Nest is set?
2. What
psychological characteristics make Chief Bromden an effective narrator?
3. How does the
individual versus the Combine encapsulate the book's conflict?
4.
Through scene analysis, define incidents of insanity as well as gender, and
racial bias.
5. How
is the fishing trip therapeutic for the patients?
6. As
seen through the eyes of Chief Bromden, whose mental illness may derive
from a cultural schism, relate Christian imagery to Mack and his
"ultimate sacrifice."
7. Describe
Ratched's ward in totalitarian terms, incorporating a discussion of her
authoritarian ways and the patients' loss of civil liberties.
8.
Discuss the psychological effect of domineering women in Cuckoo's
Nest.
9. In
the black satire
Cuckoo's Nest would electroshock therapy and lobotomy
administered as therapy and/or punishment be ethical now?
10. Throughout the
novel, trace Mack's influence on Chief Bromden's passage out of the fog
of schizophrenia.
Note: These discussion-type questions
perform the task of the text as patient; i.e., students transfer
the skill of understanding and constructing narratives and developing
critical thinking to conversing with patients, which help them to
understand their patients’ histories and think through ethical dilemmas.
Reference Works:
Cousins, Norman. Anatomy
of an Illness: As Perceived by the Patient. New York: Bantam,
1981.
Freud, Sigmund.
Introductory Lectures on Psycho-Analysis. Trans. James Strachey.
New York: Norton, 1966.
Gilman, Charlotte Perkins.
“Why I Wrote 'The Yellow Wallpaper'.” World Wide School Library.
http://worldwideschool.org
Kerouac,
Jack. On the Road. New York: Viking, 1957.
Kesey, Ken. One Flew Over
the Cuckoo’s Nest. (40th Anniversary Edition). New
York, Viking, 2002.
Robinson, Mary Frances, Ph.D.
and Walter Freeman, M.D., Ph.D. “Glimpses of Postlobotomy Personalties.”
Psychosurgery and the Self: New York: Grune, 1954: 15-32.
Siegel, Bernie S. Love,
Medicine & Miracles. New York: Harper, 1986.
Shorter, Edward. A History
of Psychiatry. New York: Wiley, 1997.
Wolfe,
Tom. The Electric Kool-Aid Acid Test. NY: Farrar, 1968.
Suggested Further Reading:
Grandin, Temple. Thinking in Pictures and Other
Reports from My Life with Autism. New York: Vintage Books, 1996.
[The increasingly diagnosed high-functioning autism blurs the lines
between normal and abnormal.]
Green,
Hannah. I Never Promised You a Rose Garden.
Kesey, Ken. The Further
Inquiry.
Jamison, Kay Redfield. An
Unquiet Mind: A Memoir
- - - . Night Falls Fast:
Understanding Suicide.
Sheehan, Susan. Is there
No Place on Earth for Me?
Styron, William. Darkness,
Visible: A Memoir of Madness.
What’s Normal: Narratives of Mental and Emotional Disorders. Ed.
Carol Donley and S. Buckley. Kent, Ohio: Kent State University Press,
2000. (Exceptional anthology]
There are those who believe Black
people possess the secret of joy and that it is this that will
sustain them through any spiritual or moral or physical devastation.
—Alice Walker, epigraph Possessing the Secret of Joy
Alice Walker’s Possessing
the Secret of Joy
(1992)
Note to teachers:
Contains mature subjects. Please see appendix D.
Historical Context
While Kesey’s One Flew Over Cuckoo’s Nest and
Walker’s Possessing the Secret of Joy are both cultural representations of mental
and physical illnesses, they are as diverse in time, setting, and
characterization as the backgrounds of their authors. Alice Walker (born
1944), the first black woman to win both the Pulitzer Prize and the
American Book Award, for The Color Purple (1983), was born to
poor sharecropper parents in
Eatonton, Georgia, the last of eight children.
Her mother’s grandmother was mostly Cherokee Indian. At the age of
nine, Walker was blinded in the right eye with a BB gun pellet and
facially disfigured while playing cowboys and Indians with her
brothers. She retreated into books. Walker excelled despite the partial
loss of eyesight, and at her high school graduation in 1961, she was
valedictorian and prom queen. She received a scholarship to Spelman
College in Atlanta, Georgia, but before she left her mother wisely gave
her three gifts: “a
sewing machine for self-sufficiency, a suitcase for independence, and a
typewriter for creativity.” While in Atlanta,
Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.
invited her to his home, and later Walker attended the Youth World Peace
Festival in Helsinki, Finland. These two events immersed her in the
civil rights movement and gave her greater understanding of other
cultures. In 1963 Walker took part in the March on Washington for Jobs
and Freedom, where she heard Dr. King’s “I Have a Dream” speech.
After two years at Spelman, Walker received a scholarship to
attend the prestigious Sarah Lawrence College in Bronxville, New York.
During her senior year she became pregnant and consequently suffered
from suicidal thoughts and depression. She poured her feelings into
poetry and a short story, “To Hell With Dying,” which was published
after receiving the endorsement of the famous poet Langston Hughes. With
the help of classmates, Walker arranged to safely abort the pregnancy,
which was illegal at the time. Following college graduation in 1965,
Walker increased her civil rights activism by the door-to-door
registering of poor voters in Georgia. Later she met and married Mel Leventhal, a Jewish law student in New York City, who later worked for
the NAACP. They moved to Mississippi where threats of violence tested
their interracial marriage. Walker got pregnant again, but lost the
baby during the frenetic time following King’s assassination. She later
delivered a healthy daughter. After receiving a number of grants and
fellowships, Walker taught at Wellesley College in Massachusetts, one of the colleges that in the nineteenth century championed women’s
rights (a movement born out of abolitionism), including voting and property
rights, education and health reform. While there, Walker created one of
the first women’s studies courses. In the mid-1970s she and
Leventhal divorced. .
After Walker finished her
most famous work, The Color Purple, she traveled to Africa to
research the oppressive practice of female genital mutilation (FGM),
which also occurs in the Middle East and in part of the Western
Hemisphere. Her work on the topic turned into Possessing the Secret of Joy,
which focuses on one woman’s traumatic experience with FGM. Later with
collaborator Pratibha Parmar she filmed a documentary with a companion
book, Warrior Marks (1993). Walker draws from a deep
reservoir of personal experiences to write realistically about many
issues in her novels and poetry. For instance, she cares very much
about poverty, racism, and the health issues that emanate from global
violence against women. Her works dramatize the oppression of women, in
particular, and lately have addressed bisexual and father-daughter
relationships. As a former teacher, she hopes to educate her readers on
the brutality of misogyny, the dangers of silent taboos, and the effects
of rituals. Her activism, which started during her college days at
Spelman, now addresses other causes such as protecting indigenous
cultures in their natural environments. Walker, a California resident,
continues to write and to lecture.
The main topic Walker
addresses in Possessing the Secret of Joy is how the female
genital mutilation ritual in a specific African tribe affects the mind,
body, and spirit of its bicultural protagonist, her family, and her
countries. However, it is necessary to note that Walker’s literary
representation of FGM applies to only a small percentage of African
tribes, and that the surgical ritual is conducted in many different
ways, in hospitals as well as in huts, for many different reasons. For
these general purposes, the procedure is more descriptively called
female genital cutting (FGC) because, by degree, it ranges from a slight
ceremonial nicking of the clitoris to draw blood to the more radical
excision (removing some or all of the outer genitals) and
infibulation (sewing up the vagina and leaving a small opening for
urination and menstrual flow). The ritual’s end result spans the gamut
from a proud youth who has experienced a spiritual initiation into
adulthood and elevated tribal status to a scared young girl’s agonizing
pain and lingering death. A woman who has had the more radical
procedure often has very painful intercourse and child delivery. Even
the newborn may be harmed mentally and physically from passing through
the narrow opening. After childbirth, the woman is reinfibulated, or
sewn back up.
The origin of FGC goes back
as far as Aristotle’s thinking that women were unfinished men;
consequently, the malformed and unclean female parts needed altering.
It is believed Queen Cleopatra of Egypt had undergone pharaonic circumcision to, theoretically, ensure a union that could
extend her realm’s interests. Historically, only a virgin who could
protect the paternal bloodline was marriageable, and therefore FGC
(euphemistically “having a bath” or “cutting the rose”) effected a sort
of chastity belt. It became a mother’s duty to keep her daughter pure
until marriage, and therefore a prospective bride’s excised and
infibulated vagina became aesthetically desirable. In addition, a
desexed girl was more likely to keep chaste until and during marriage.
For these reasons, African mothers who force FGC on their daughters help
maintain their status and that of their daughters. In 2003, a 32-year-old unwed pregnant Nigerian mother, charged with adultery, was sentenced
to death by stoning in a case where global human rights activists
debated fundamentalist Islamic law. Because of international attention she was found not guilty by an Islamic appeals court.
Thus, a mother who takes extreme measures to keep her daughter chaste
could even protect her life. Contrary to popular belief, the rite of
passage tradition in some cultures does not derive solely from male
dominance; rather, it gives the girls who prove their bravery by
transcending physical pain more control over their tribal lives. In
fact, some describe their experience as spiritual ecstasy. Those who
show cowardice (“crying the knife”) are socially ostracized. The
tradition in a few tribes includes boys who vie for tribal leadership by
a test of their courage. They must be stoic while, without anesthesia,
their penises are circumcised and ritually mutilated.
Putting FGC into its cultural
context and comparing it with other rituals, taboos, and practices is
helpful. Christian missionaries were trying to eradicate FGC in Africa
at the same time Puritan moralists in America believed
clitoridectomy was a necessary surgery to control nymphomania and
masturbation and to cure hysteria and melancholia. While some argue
that there is no sound medical reason for male circumcision, in the
Western world and elsewhere it is still done both for hygienic purposes
and as a powerful religious ritual. However, for males, circumcision
(the removal of the foreskin) is relatively trivial—unless it goes awry—
compared to its female counterpart (clitoridectomy, at its worst), in
which sexual pleasure is replaced with pain. Other related myths, taboos,
and practices shed light on how FGC is culturally represented.
Historically, menstruation and menopause myths declaring women unclean
or undesirable, respectively, have mandated isolation and subjugation.
Ancient Chinese foot binding hobbled women into a helpless desirability,
while recent headlines report female infanticide where sons are
desirable.
Whether rituals, traditions,
and practices are considered heinous or not is a matter of perspective,
though, because to many around the world the American death penalty (an
ancient form of justice stemming from the philosophy of an eye for an eye) is considered
barbaric. A hot contemporary issue in the United States is the sexual
reassignment of hermaphrodites or intersexuals (1 in 2,000 births; or
.5% of the population) whose genitals do not fit into the culture's binary
notions. Cheryl Chase, born with ambiguous genitals, argues in
“’Cultural Practice’ or ‘Reconstructive Surgery’? U.S. Genital Cutting”
that it is a double standard to call FGM a barbaric ritual and sexual
reassignment surgery a scientific necessity exempt from the federal law
banning FGM. Chase asserts that in sexual reassignment cases, done
since the 1950s, surgeons perpetuate violence against intersexuals by
trying to transform “transgressive bodies into ones that can safely be
labeled female and subjected to the many forms of social control with
which women must contend” (Chase, 145). Doctors said Chase, born with a
micropenis, undescended testes, hypospadias, and other abnormalities,
could not function as a male in our society, so he was surgically and
hormonally altered to appear female but is nonorgasmic and infertile,
something s/he is not emotionally comfortable with. U.S. surgeons
reconstruct intersexuals’ genitals to fit into a narrowly defined
psycho-social system, just as mothers who force FGM onto their daughters
consider their social well being in the particular tribal culture.
Whether it occurs here or in Africa, Chase asks, Isn’t genitally
mutilating children who cannot give informed consent child abuse?
Anthropologists and missionaries have known about FGC for
many centuries. It was brought to the popular consciousness, though, in
a 1980 Ms. Magazine article by Gloria
Steinem and Robin Morgan titled “The International Crime of Genital
Mutilation.” Later Democratic Representative Patricia Schroeder of
Colorado shocked Congress
with the reality of FGM, and eventually it passed the Federal
Prohibition of Female Genital Mutilation Act in 1996, making it a
federal crime punishable by up to five years in prison. Intersex
reassignment surgeries are exempt. Alice
Walker, who fictionalized the issue in Possessing the Secret
of Joy and others who wrote about their private ordeals have
horrified Americans. What followed these revelations was a Western media
blitz on national news and talk shows. Claire C. Robertson, interested
both in diminishing FGC and in eradicating poverty, writes in “Getting
Beyond the Ew! Factor” that she is concerned about these “tendencies
toward sensationalism and polemics,” saying First World feminists seem
arrogant and Americans voyeuristic with prurient tendencies when “All
issues were being subsumed into this one and African women [were] being
reduced to their genital status” (Robertson, 54-5). Can we claim moral superiority
in a country where increasing incidents of rape, sexual assault,
wife battering, and sexual harassment against women
made it necessary for us to pass the Violence Against Women Act in
1994?
Whether or not
First World countries can claim moral
superiority, it is going to take the hard work of an international
community, including the support of Amnesty International, the World
Health Organization, and the United Nations, as well as local and
international human rights and women’s organizations, to debate the
violation of human rights and health issues. The polar positions taken
are: 1) extreme cultural relativism—FGC practiced on girls is tied up
with national identity, and we cannot judge another country’s morals and
interfere; or 2) we should withhold aid from countries practicing FGC.
With the consequences of FGC stirring the public conscience, it is not
that easy to remain uninvolved, as evidenced in the action our
government took in AIDS
funding.. In 2003 former South African president and Nobel Peace Prize
laureate Nelson Mandela praised President George W. Bush for pledging $15 billion
to fight AIDS, a disease expected to kill 20 million more Africans by
the end of the decade. The United Nations estimates that 45 million
worldwide are HIV-infected. The world community continues to
interfere in domestic human rights issues by condemning slavery,
genocide, and infanticide, while it educates and provides other basic
needs, such as food, clean water, and urgent health care. The two
million girls every year who undergo FGC, and especially infibulation,
risk a myriad of mental and physical health problems, including shock,
trauma, and hemorrhage; bacterial and HIV infections; incontinence and
menstrual problems; sterility, frigidity, and childbirth problems. Many
will die. As difficult as eliminating the culturally-entrenched habit
of smoking, which annually kills 440,000 Americans and 4.9 million
worldwide, the World Health Organization says it will take educating
three generations and many more years to eradicate FGC.
Part of the world feels it’s contentious to call their
venerable female circumcision rite “mutilation”; nevertheless, for most
Americans Secretary of State Madeleine Albright put it best: “When
people are mutilated, it is criminal, not cultural.”
Literary Analysis
In Possessing the
Secret of Joy the
black liberal feminist Alice Walker dramatizes how her main character,
Tashi, in an act of tribal allegiance, gets facial scarring and
circumcision “because she recognized it as the only remaining definitive
stamp of Olinka tradition." The tribe’s leader, who is compared
to Nelson Mandela and even Jesus Christ, has instructed the people “not [to]
neglect ancient customs.” He has been imprisoned by the white regime.
Walker explores the effects of FGM in a dazzling style that
simultaneously seems to contrast and to transcend cultural differences.
The various viewpoints are artfully integrated into dialogue and
flashbacks, intermixed with myths, symbols, and psychology. Walker uses
the narrative device of renaming Tashi relative to her changing cultural
and psychological state of mind; for example, when referring to her evolving
American self she is “Tashi-Evelyn.” In this way, Walker conveys the
essence of Tashi’s journey. However, Tashi is not described
sympathetically because she was circumcised against the wishes of her
Christian mother whose other daughter died as a result of FGM. Furthermore,
because
Tashi was sexually responsive with Adam, she knows the operation will
result in a loss of pleasure. Even after Tashi’s sparkling youthfulness
turns into a flat-eyed passivity, Adam marries her, and she emigrates
with him to America. Only then does she understand her physical and
emotional loss and explode into rage. This analysis focuses on
Walker's literary achievement in Possessing the Secret of Joy,
in which she creates a bicultural lens through
which we can examine Tashi’s African soul and warring American
consciousness.
The title, Possessing the Secret of Joy, reflected in
the first epigraph, derives more fully from a passage in
Mirella Ricciardi’s 1982 memoir African
Saga. Ricciardi was a French-Italian woman born and raised on a
farm in Kenya, then a colony in British East Africa, who wrote, “Black
people are natural,
they possess
the secret of joy, which is why they can survive the suffering and
humiliation inflicted upon them. They are alive physically and
emotionally, which makes them easy to live with. What I had not yet
learned to deal with was their cunning and their natural instinct for
self-preservation” (Ricciardi 147). The condescending tone of Ricciardi’s colonial
remembrance highlights how nationalistic backlash plays into Tashi’s
mindset when she undergoes FGM. In Possessing’s scenario, a
First World organization’s attempts to change
a Third World
culture causes defiant anticolonial acts.
Walker’ssecond
epigraph/proverb further sets the story into its bicultural context,
prophesying Tashi’s state of being torn apart from within: “When
the axe came into the forest, the trees said the handle is one of us."
Walker’s plot
borrows further from Ngugi wa Thiong’o’s novel The River Between
(1965), in which two lovers living across the river from each other play
out the drama of Christian converts clashing with African
traditionalists. Like The River Between, Walker’s theme in Possessing
argues that female circumcision destroys not only individual women but
their country as well. Tashi endures pain to prove her devotion to
tribal heritage—she symbolizes ritual sacrifice and the ultimate hope
for change. Conversely, the circumciser M’Lissa, a “monument,”
symbolizes age-old beliefs and keeping the old ways.
Possessing
the Secret of Joy is a vehicle for Walker’s own feminist
agenda. By putting Tashi into a particular context, Walker is able to
develop her human rights and health issues, as well as argue for
political change.
Tashi’s story
becomes part of Walker’s own. For instance, the autobiographical
elements are clear when Walker refers to FGM as “sexual blinding,” a
reference to her brothers shooting her in the eye and swearing her to
silence. Both Walker and her character Tashi aborted a pregnancy and
bridged cultures in search of an identity. They are storytellers whose
myths teach lessons, filling the novel with stories of repression, of
struggles, and eventually of self-actualization. Walker’s strong female
character, Adam’s lover Lisette (Walker’s alter-ego), is an altruistic
white woman who, as the voice of reason, contrasts with the emotional
Tashi. As a youth Lisette had visited Olinka with a church youth group,
and her family were colonists in Algeria. As an adult, she is a high
school French teacher in Paris who studies her ”co-wife” Tashi from
afar. The novel’s opening “parable of the panther” foreshadows the
Tashi-Adam-Lisette love triangle and even foretells the outcome. Adam’s
child with Tashi, the American-born retarded Benny, is a painful
sideshow for Western doctors; his child with Lisette, the Paris-born
precocious Pierre, is the result of a natural, orgasmic home birth. The
autonomous Lisette starkly contrasts with the fractured Tashi.
After Lisette dies from cancer, Pierre "continues to untangle the
threads of mystery that kept [his stepmother Tashi] enmeshed."
He
reports that FGM may have been a reaction to “the Hottentot apron,” or,
as described by early European anthropologists, the unusually elongated
labia on uncircumcised Khoisan
women with enlarged buttocks
(steatopygia). The bisexual and biracial Harvard-educated Pierre
explains how some tribes eventually decided a woman’s dual genitalia
needed modifying because she could not perform both female and male
roles. Continuing on Tashi’s journey to self-knowledge, Olivia
takes her sister-in-law to her first “shrink,” a white “son of Freud”
couch-analyst who gawks at her as a publishable case history. He
simplistically declares that healing is impossible because Africans
cannot blame their mothers. Tashi’s next analyst is Lisette’s uncle,
the Old Man or Mzee. Clearly, as Walker references in her
afterword, her Old Man character is Carl Jung (1875-1961), the
Swiss analytical psychologist who opposed Freud’s idea that the libido
(sexual instinct) alone drives life. Jung differed from Freud by
espousing an interest in the opposites in nature (the divided self),
even expressed in the way Jung, unlike Freud’s couch analysis, sat in a
chair opposite his patient to actively engage in dialogue.
Applying the Old Man’s
Jungian psychology to the bicultural and divided Tashi, she must reconcile
her conscious ego with her unconscious, repressed experiences through
interpreting her dreams, stories, and art. For example, during art
therapy, after Tashi draws a large, evil rooster (“a humongous feathered
creature”), she felt she was “seeing the cause of [her] anxiety itself
for the first time, exactly as it was.” It was a beast-sized indication
of her psychosis, the “[e]motions that had frightened her insane.” All
at once Tashi remembered hiding in the grass and witnessing her sister’s
murder: “No longer would my weeping be separate from what I
knew.” The insidious tribal taboo, demanding silence and repression, had subverted her childhood
memory. In Possessing Walker applies to Tashi’s recovery the
Jungian analysis she herself underwent. Jung’s archetypal elements of
the ego (central consciousness), shadow (unpleasant
unconscious—Dr. Jekyll to Mr. Hyde), animus (Tashi’s masculine
unconscious mind), and Self (whole regulating center of the
psyche, transcending the ego) help identify Tashi’s psychological
process toward wholeness or individuation. More simply put, Walker
equates Jung’s psychic ideal—harmonizing the conscious and unconscious;
decentralizing the ego; and acknowledging the shadow and animus—with
Tashi’s coming to terms with her past, at last bringing her discovered
Self spiritual peace. Even Walker’s final chapter heading, “Tashi
Evelyn Johnson Soul,” cues the reader that Tashi’s fragmented mental
state is at last reconciled.
After the Old Man dies, Tashi’s new analyst, the
black
American feminist Raye, only understands Tashi’s physical pain after
having periodontal surgery. Tashi opens up to her, breaking her silence
and referencing her shadow or dark self, and self-acceptance follows. Raye and Pierre analyze Tashi’s dream of being the
queen termite
imprisoned in a dark tower with broken wings. In African culture, the
protruding termite hill symbolizes an elevated clitoris barring male
entry; the hill being cut down symbolizes the ritual desexing.
Because
the girl’s male soul is in the clitoris, it must be excised to rid her
of the dangerous duality. Nonetheless,
Tashi’s personal anguish cannot be assuaged by Pierre’s anthropological
facts, the Old Man’s analytical psychology, or Raye’s empathy alone, so
she premeditates killing the old circumciser M’Lissa. Tashi
returns to Africa with a banner that reads, "If you lie to yourself
about your own pain, you will be killed by those who claimed you enjoyed
it." Ironically, M’Lissa is disdainful about her ancient practice,
unfeelingly excising and infibulating the Olinkan girls, and even
expects to be martyred, robbing Tashi of complete satisfaction. Walker,
as embodied in Possessing, speaks more to the tribal mothers who
she believes subject their daughters to perpetual lies, familiar
tortures, and to the numerous murders of the spirit.
Walker’s novel, detractors
say, is overwrought sensationalism and polemics and should not be read
as a fact-based anthropological study of FGM, in decline since 1920.
Nevertheless, Walker’s feminist ideology in Possessing has had an impact
on FGM
legislation here and cultural interventions abroad. But it tends to
subsume the myriad of issues facing African women into the reductionist’s view they are only mutilated genitals. Hence, the “yuck
factor” eclipses productive debate. On the other hand, the cultural relativists
believe tribal customs are an integral part of each society and should be
observed but not interfered with. In the mid-twentieth century their
controversial views
superseded the late- nineteenth-century Social Darwinians
who tended to classify (read subjugate) societies on the basis of
race. Regrettably, when First World organizations attack tribal
practices perceived as objectionable, nationalistic backlashes occur.
Moreover, the notion of women as oppressed victims of men becomes
questionable in some cultures where the social interaction in FGC builds
sisterhoods and elevates their tribal status, says Efua Dorkenoo in
Cutting the Rose. Critics contend that Walker’s Possessing
the Secret of Joy created an explosive topic with some misrepresentation and started a
mass media trend toward First World voyeurism, leaving to be desired
practical approaches to address human rights and health issues.
Possessing the Secret of
Joy
is about one woman’s struggle with her African heritage and her right to
self-determination beyond cultural constraints. It is not a
factual anthropologist’s case study but rather has the emotional power
of literature. Even as sensationalized cultural criticism, it has added
to the general dialogue on human rights and health issues. In
principle, it foregrounds a number of issues of cultural, medical, and
legal importance. It shows women complicit in a world run by male
ideologies; culture intersecting with gender and health issues; and
Walker’s ethical basis for a controversial worldwide stance. In a
postscript Walker addresses her reader, saying she does not know where
her African ancestors came from, but she claims Tashi as her sister.
While Possessing powerfully addresses FGM and highlights AIDS,
for some her Western feminist approach remains problematic. In the end, Tashi’’s friend Mbati reflects on the colonialist memoir, Ricciardi’s
African Saga, underscoring Walker’s interpretation of “possessing
the secret of joy”: "Oh, I say. These settler cannibals. Why don't they
just steal our land, mine our gold, chop down our forests, pollute our
rivers, enslave us to work on their farms, fuck us, devour our flesh and
leave us alone? Why must they also write about how much joy we
possess?" At Tashi’s execution, her friends and family hold a sign:
"RESISTANCE IS THE SECRET OF JOY!" And only after dying, when her
divided selves unite into her whole Self, has Tashi resisted what is
evil (the power over her) to possess “the secret of joy.”
Synopsis of the Novel
In Walker’s Possessing the Secret of Joy there are seven main
characters, and every few pages the viewpoint changes with each new
speaker. Tashi, who is a peripheral character in The Color Purple,
has shown allegiance to her Olinkan people by having the tribal marks
cut onto her face and by having the female genital cutting ceremony. The
book begins in a flashback when the imaginative Tashi, who is now an
American, reflects on what her life has become. Telling the parable of
the panthers, Tashi sets the tone for the whole book, and she moves the
plot along by intermittently telling myths and stories. Raised in Olinka,
Tashi’s sister, Dura, died after a ceremonial genital cutting ritual.
The African-American missionary’s children, Olivia and Adam, befriend
Tashi. Adam becomes her lover, breaking tribal taboos. Adam also meets
Lisette, a white French Algerian missionary, with whom he shares stories
of the Olinkan culture. Tashi, in the name of Olinkan pride, has the
circumciser M’Lissa excise and infibulate her, above the protests of her
Christian mother, Adam, and Olivia. By doing this, she intends to join
in solidarity with the other women, whom she envisions as completely
strong and invincible African women. Days after the operation, Tashi is
told to sit up and walk a few steps—her own proud walk has become a
permanent shuffle. It takes 15 minutes to urinate now. Her
menstrual cramps last half the month because it is nearly impossible for
flow to pass through so tiny an aperture. The residual flow that does
not find its way out and is not reabsorbed into her body has nowhere to
go; so the odor of soured blood follows her around. Tashi’s friend
Olivia observes, “That her soul had been dealt a mortal blow was plain
for anyone who dared look into her eyes.”
Adam marries his friend, the
once proud and lively Tashi, who is now heartbreakingly slowed by pain,
and he takes her back to the United States. Living biculturally, Tashi
cannot rationalize the emotional anguish she experiences daily in the
name of her tribal leader’s call for Olinkan pride, so she sees several
psychiatrists. The first one tells her Negro women cannot be cured
”because they can never bring themselves to blame their mothers.” Tashi
still thinks of herself as an African woman, not an American Negro.
Another psychiatrist, Lisette’s white uncle (the Old Man or Mzee), tries
to help Tashi in Switzerland with art therapy and by analyzing her
dreams, which she cannot share with her husband. When the Old Man dies,
the black feminist Raye becomes her therapist. Tashi explains to her how
their African leader mandated FGM from one generation to the next
through a sacred tribal code, there being a strong cultural taboo
against speaking of it to outsiders. The act was designed to
keep the female body pure by cutting out the “dual female soul” that
interferes with male domination. If a woman is not circumcised, the
myth goes, her unclean parts will grow long and touch her thighs.
Unremedied, warn the elders, who act as if they have recently witnessed
this evil, no man can enter this masculine woman, who arouses herself.
The circumcised women do not remember having vaginal lips or a clitoris,
so they laugh and jeer at the monstrous “tail”; circumcised girls run
from “the demon.” The tribe passes on unverified beliefs because
the
old ways must be kept. Tashi, who had been a young orgasmic girl
with Adam, gave up her sexuality to preserve the old ways.
In America, Adam and Tashi have a son, Benny, born retarded
from passing through the birth canal narrowed by FGM. Unable to bear
further pain, Tashi then aborts a subsequent pregnancy. Adam later
becomes reacquainted with the free spirited Lisette, and they become
lovers, seeing each other on his biannual visits to Paris. Together
they have a child, Pierre, which enrages the dispirited Tashi. Pierre,
unlike Benny, is bright and inquisitive—he studies black American
literature and decides to go to school in America. His mother has died,
and he wants to become closer to his father. Tashi feels threatened and
attacks Pierre. Tashi returns to Olinka when she reads about M’Lissa’s
becoming a venerated symbol of Olinkan pride. In an elaborate scheme,
the tortured Tashi, now in “advanced middle age,” plots her revenge.
She seeks an “audience” with the venerated circumciser M’Lissa, and over
a period of several weeks they talk. Tashi ritually washes her intended
victim, who taunts her for foolishly submitting to circumcision.
M’Lissa is prepared to become a martyr, and Tashi smothers her with a
pillow as she attends her. She is indicted for murder.
Tashi is imprisoned in Olinka and put on trial for killing
M’Lissa. Her family and friends are there to support her, and Adam
reflects on how he has witnessed his wife’s “hell on earth.” The prison
also houses a whole floor of AIDS patients waiting to die. Many believe
they contracted AIDS in an experiment, like the Tuskegee Syphilis Study,
when scientists “vaccinated” them for polio. In the end, Tashi grows
weary of the plodding trial and confesses to the murder; nevertheless,
the trial, a media circus, goes on. At her execution by firing squad on
the soccer field, Tashi is released from her tortured soul for “killing
someone who, many years ago, killed me.” Adam, Olivia, Benny, Pierre,
Raye, and Mbati hold a banner: RESISTANCE IS THE SECRET OF JOY!
Questions for oral and written discussion:
1.
Compare and contrast Kesey’s Big Chief and Walker’s Tashi as examples of
how mental and physical illness derives from a specific culture as well
as from disease. How have Cuckoo’s Nest and Possessing
had the power to change the system?
2. With
increasing global awareness of human rights violations effected through
literature and organizations such as Amnesty International, the World
Health Organization, and the United Nations, why do certain cultural
practices like FGM and stoning continue? What are cultural relativism
and Social Darwinism? Relate the culturally entrenched habit of smoking
(also called the “brown plague”) to FGM?
3.
Reflecting on Tashi’s painful physical abnormalities, describe how it
affects her mental state, as she describes it to her various mental
professionals. How in particular does the Jungian analytical
psychologist work with her to ultimately achieve her Self?
4.While
the Olinkan male Leader appears to mandate FGM, how and why are the
tribal women complicit in maintaining the ritual?
5.Compare and contrast the tortured Tashi and the free- spirited
Lisette. How do these two women interrelate?
6.
Discuss how Pierre and Benny represent their respective mother’s
autonomy and inadequacies.
7. How
does Walker, an imaginative storyteller, use symbols (Tashi, M’Lissa,
termite hill, clay), parables, and myths to tell Tashi’s story and to
teach a lesson?
8. .As
highlighted in Possessing, how has the Tuskegee Syphilis Study
impacted the question of trust in treating AIDS in Africa?
9. What
is M’Lissa’s perspective on FGM and her actions, as told to Tashi before
her death?
10. On
Tashi’s journey toward wholeness, what is her resistance to, in
teaching us about possessing the secret of joy?
Referenced Works:
Amnesty
International. Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948).
http://www.amnestyusa.org/udhr.html.
Baartman,
Saartjie. Tragic Venus. August 15, 2003. http://www.insanetree.com/images/special/saartjie.htm
Chase,
Cheryl. “’Cultural Practice’ or ‘Reconstructive Surgery’? U.S. Genital
Cutting, the Intersex Movement, and Medical Double Standards.”
Genital Cutting and Transnational Sisterhood: Disputing U.S. Polemics.
Ed. Stanlie M. James and Claire C. Robertson. U of Illinois P,
2002. 126-51
Dorkenson, Efua. Cutting
the Rose. London:
Minority Rights, 1994.
The C.G. Jung Page: An
Introduction to Jung.
http://www.cgjungpage.org/jpintro.html
Jung,
Carl. Man and His Symbols. New York: Dell, 1968
Ngugi,
wa Thiong'O. The River Between. NH: Heinemann, 1965.
Ricciardi,
Mirella. African
Saga. London:
Collins, 1981. [sic]
Robertson, Claire C. “Getting Beyond the Ew! Factor: Rethinking U.S.
Approaches to African Female Genital Cutting.” Genital Cutting
and Transnational Sisterhood:
Disputing U.S. Polemics.
Ed. Stanlie M.
James and Claire C. Robertson. U of
Illinois
P, 2002. 54-86
Understanding Violence Against Women.
National Academy P, 1996. .
Walker,
Alice. Possessing the Secret of Joy. New York: HBJ, 1992.
- - - , and
Pratibha Parmar, eds. Warrior Marks: Female Genital Mutilation and
the
Sexual Blinding of Women.
New York: Harcourt, 1993.
Book and video
World
Health Organization, Fact Sheet No 241: Female Genital Mutilation
June 2000.
http://www.who.int/inf-fs/en/fact241.html
Suggested
Further Reading:
Atwood,
Margaret. The Handmaid’s Tale. New York: Fawcett, 1986.
Chopin, Kate. The
Awakening. New York: Bard-Avon, 1972. A desperate women swims out
to sea (1899).
Conrad, Joseph. Heart of
Darkness. 1901: Available on-line. Marlow travels to the
dark interior of Congo searching for his European self in Mr. Kurtz.
Eugendies, Jeffrey. Middlesex. New York: Farrar, 2002.
Kassindja, Fauziya. Do
They Hear You When You Cry? New York: Delacorte, 1998.
Thiam, Awa.
Speak Out, Black Sisters: Feminism and Oppression in Black Africa.
London: Pluto, 1978. Graphic descriptions of FGM; cultural
perspectives.
Walker, Alice. “Advancing
Luna—and Ida B. Wells.” You Can’t Keep a Good Woman Down: Short
Stories. New York: Harvest-Harcourt, 1981. 85-104 A White woman
raped by a Black civil-rights leader remains silent to advance the
cause.
- - -. The
Color Purple. New York: Washington Square P, 1982.
Whitney, Ruth
Linnea. Slim. Dallas, Texas: SMU P, 2003.
ALL RIGHTS
RESERVED
|